This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
In the producer parameter it says: EMI Televisa. - Is that a mistake and ment to be under the label parameter, or did EMI Televisa actually produce the song?
Lead
"and has since been in several compilation albums following Selena's death in 1995 by her friend and ex-manager, Yolanda Saldivar." - Yolanda Saldivar, was convicted of Selena's murder, however with this sentence, you convey that Saldivar was responsible for the inclusion of "Dame Tu Amor" on several compilation albums. Could you consider rewording?
Background
Everything looks good here
Critical reception and release
Same as here
Chart performance
Good
References
Good here
Article
On the talk page, it says the article has been automating rated as an 'Stub article' by a bot. According to the GA Criteria, a stub article cannot meet the criteria.
However, the last assessment was on March 13, 2011. Considering that is was such a long time ago, could you have someone reassess the article?
Reviewer:EditorE (talk·contribs) 22:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
After doing only one edit on this page, every issue mentioned in the previous review seems to be fixed, so GA passing here we go! EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty!22:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply