Talk:Damon Dash

Page reset and page protection dropped

I've archived this talk page and reset the page using some suggested text from an editor. The page itself is now open to rebuilding by users interested as long as it follows the usual policies and guidelines, most especially Verifiability and Neutral Point of View. The former content should not just be reinserted. I apologize for the long standing protection on this page and while the office protection remains (and has been downgraded to semi protection for now as it rebuilds) that is not meant to be or anticipated as a long term action. I would personally like to keep it under a month and am open to shorter if the article progresses. Jalexander--WMF 02:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm really really glad that the office protection is over, but did we really just replace it with an article with 0 citations? :/ Legoktm (talk) 07:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, not the best, I fought over that a bit but was trying to stub it in such a way as to do as little 'content' work myself as possible. So used a 'I know this is true and will get a reference soon' approach and used the text suggested by an editor on Philippe's talk page. I really appreciate you getting it, thank you. Jalexander--WMF 12:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 31 July 2013

you should write more things about him because he was engaged to marry aaliyah but as you know she died august 31, 2001 so there was no marraige how can ou have a full report on aaliyah but not have a full report on damon dash thats crazy and wrong i know alot of people dont read it but i do annd i needed that informaton for a project so it would be very hepful if you would fulfill me request please and thank you

216.54.1.206 (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2014

here is an article that would provide with verified informations : http://www.details.com/celebrities-entertainment/music-and-books/201402/damon-dash-hip-hop-entrepreneur-jay-z-fallout cordially. 83.202.0.181 (talk) 10:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

• Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Provide verification for what? Also, I'm not sure that constitutes a reliable source. Technical 13 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Explanation?

This article has now been under WP:OFFICE action for over two years. Is there some explanation for this anywhere? I can't find anything in the archives, WP:ANI etc except speculation. Surely the office must have given some explanation for their actions? If so, it should be mentioned at the top of this talk page. If not, then the community deserves to be informed. Modest Genius ^talk 18:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

While this could easily be speculation, Philippe had implied to me a while ago that Damon Dash threatened to sue over what he viewed as a badly written article that violated BLP. Because the Foundation doesn't have a dedicated legal fund; they had to concede to Dash or fight a lawsuit that could've easily bankrupted them. I think that the Foundation wants to wait a long time before they stop monitoring the article so the current version is improved enough to gain consensus. --Thebirdlover (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

• Unfortunately we can not always say exactly why we protected a page, and this is one of those times. We do it very rarely and think very hard about it and have reevaluated this one a couple times since then. Unfortunately when we are unable to talk about the reasons conjecture on them can be dangerous because it runs a severe legal risk for the foundation and the projects and I would ask that we not do so here. I think we are at a point in the article where a new evaluation is probably warranted and am going to talk to one of the lawyers tomorrow to make sure we are in agreement and will update here what the decision is as soon as possible. Jalexander--WMF 02:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • As an update for this we have decided that the reset has gone well enough to justify releasing Office Scrutiny. I left the semi protection on since it had been done for blp reasons but there is no restriction on it's removal etc by the community. Jalexander--WMF 19:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

    Thanks James. I think leaving it on semi is fine for now, and we can try lowering it a few months from now. Legoktm (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

    • Take it off semi now? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC).
      
      • Personally I think there is some justification for keeping it on semi indefinitely for now given past issues and some community norms for BLPs where the user has asked for scrutiny/been concerned. That said while I'm keeping an eye on the page (like I do many pages) the official office scrutiny is over so whatever the community decides :) Jalexander--WMF 00:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

April 2015 New York arrest warrant / doesn't pay child support

• http://www.eonline.com/news/651796/rachel-roy-custody-drama-warrant-out-for-damon-dash-s-arrest-for-failure-to-pay-nearly-350-000-in-child-support
• Warrant Out in New York for Damon Dash's Arrest for Failure to Pay Nearly $350,000 in Child Support
• "The drama comes a week after Roy obtained full custody (with [supervised, one day a week] visitation rights for Dash) of their two daughters and secured a three-year restraining order against him. They divorced in 2009 after roughly four years of marriage."

• http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/damon-dash-pay-342k-ex-wife-dodge-jail-article-1.2204381
• Damon Dash hit with arrest warrant, ordered to pay $342K to ex-wife to avoid jail
• "Roy, 41, now lives with their daughters, Tallulah, 8, and Ava, 15, in California. She got full custody two weeks ago after Dash, 43, didn’t show up in a California court. The California judge allowed him to have supervised Sunday afternoon visits with the girls, but Roy got a three-year restraining order that forbids him from going near her."
• "In matrimonial court on Wednesday [April 29, 2015], in addition to the arrest warrant, Cooper ordered Dash to pay $25,000 toward Roy’s legal bills."

12.180.133.18 (talk) 11:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2015

Can you add his media collective DD172 to this Wikipedia article?

If a source is needed: http://www.mtv.com/news/1627129/damon-dash-brings-artists-together-with-dd172/ 12.180.133.18 (talk) 03:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC) 12.180.133.18 (talk) 03:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 21:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damon Dash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811234105/http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2010/01/welcome_to_damo.php to http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2010/01/welcome_to_damo.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)