This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
331dot, thanks for your attention. The page has been subject to persist vandalism. I was about to submit to RPP to request a short break but if you can help that would be great. Thanks much. Innisfree987 (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Vaselineeeeeeee, this is false. He suggested killing “white supremacy”. Here is the full quote: “White supremacy is a virus that, like other viruses, will not die until there are no bodies left for it to infect. Which means the only way to stop it is to locate it, isolate it, extract it, and kill it. I guess a vaccine could work, too. But we’ve had 400 years to develop one, so I won’t hold my breath.” What you’ve written is at minimum a serious BLP violation; those policies apply equally to talk pages so I suggest you remove it. Innisfree987 (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I was just quoting what the Washington Examiner quoted but it does seem to be picking quotes from two separate paragraphs of his, one about whiteness, one about white supremacy, and combines them. The quote you added is not the one garnering attention, the one garnering attention is Whiteness is a public health crisis. It shortens life expectancies, it pollutes air, it constricts equilibrium, it devastates forests, it melts ice caps, it sparks (and funds) wars, it flattens dialects, it infests consciousnesses, and it kills people—white people and people who are not white. I parked this here to see if any other criticisms about his piece come from this. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★19:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for correcting. I’m not opposed to including if it does get sufficient RS coverage to demonstrate significance. I haven’t seen anything (there were a lot of IPs adding personal commentary to the entry but all unsourced.) Innisfree987 (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
[3]I think it's a bit disingenuous to not include at least some reference to Mr. Young's more caustic side. Regardless of your politics it's difficult to deny his remarks are being taken as a call to action for genocide (just read the comments section). Also, the original published article at The Root [4] does indeed use the word "pandemic". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tususpect (talk • contribs) 13:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Tususpect, I see this is your first edit. Welcome! Editing operates a little differently than people often imagine as readers. We include things (or not) based on how many reliable sources have discussed them. This is because WP is a tertiary source, collecting the sum of knowledge already vetted by reliable secondary sources: no original research allowed. So something can get a lot of heat in a comment section or Twitter but we don’t write about it until sufficient secondary sources do. WP is not censored so it’s not a matter of anyone’s politics (and anyway presumably some people share his politics while others object, so it’s not necessarily his supporters who will unhappy about including an accurate description of what he wrote). Hope that helps! Innisfree987 (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
