After congress

edit

I removed the snipit on Coats starting after 9/11 because it is irrelevant to the article.

I have also changed this sections use of his first name to his last name. This is something we should be following throughout the article as per WP:SURNAME. TheIguana (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is a candidate "Senator-elect" five minutes after the networks call the election? Or do they become "Senator-elect" only after the board of elections (or the Secretary of State) certify their election? 02 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.31.2 (talk)

US Congress: Gun voting record section

edit

The US congress section has a great deal of weight on Coats gun voting record. While this is an important aspect of his tenure as a Congressperson I am concerned about this issue warranting over two-thirds of his US Congress section. This amount of content places undue weight on one of the many topics that would have been in the lime light during his tenure. TheIguana (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lobbyist

edit

The opening para includes "lobbyist" in the list of Coats' professions, but that is the last mention of it. (Was this info scrubbed from a previous version?) A quick internet search says he's done two separate stints as a lobbyist, between government jobs. More detail is required in the "After Congress" section, since no account is made of his activities in the 2005 - 2010 period. When was he a lobbyist? Did he lobby for a company (King & Spalding is one name that pops up) or was he self-employed? What issues, industries or groups did he lobby for? He's on his way back to the Senate now, and inquiring minds will want to know more. 24.128.188.152 (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

committee assignments

edit

A section on Coats' Senate activity post 2010 and his committee assignments should be added. 74.69.11.229 (talk) 12:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dan Coats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Controversy

edit

Recent accusations by Anonymous of Dan Coats having KKK membership is pretty notable, but this article is partially locked for me to add it. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.157.118.97 (talkcontribs) 2 November 2015

Hacktivist groups are not reliable sources. If this is independently confirmed then it can be added. LoneWolf1992 (talk) 23:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Anonymous denies naming Coats and other politicians as KKK members. APK whisper in my ear 07:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

What did he do in the Army?

edit

I'm curious about such things and looked him up.

This article [1] says he left as a Staff Sergeant.

This report [2] says he served in the Corps of Engineers.

Probably not enough here to make a new section, but if anyone finds more it may be worth considering. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dan Coats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Coats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Citation for Ratcliffe nomination is TWITTER???

edit

Multiple articles referring to this announcement are out. If we are citing using a social media post, we need to add a publication: why? Twitter etal SM postings can be removed/exited/blocked from general view. Also, as mentioned on the talk page for John Ratcliffe, check dates: I have now found three (3) different ones. Stemgal92 (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

You are right about citing Twitter; I have replaced that link with a secondary source. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply