Neutrality

edit

This article contains biased language. Example: "Osborn was later fired by Kellogg's on what he and others consider to be trumped up charges." BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removed.Djflem (talk) 04:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

photo requested

edit

Is there no photo of Dan Osborn? He’s a major union leader and likely Senate nominee 2601:646:8F80:7050:EDAE:86A8:A55A:3AF (talk) 03:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fotos added have been added; tag removed Djflem (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sources/refs

edit

Do not play politics with Wikipedia Pages and Editing

edit

Stop playing politics with Wikipedia Pages and editing of pages. I am against the deletion of Dan Osborn the wikipedia page. Mosesbrazas (talk) 00:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Mosesbrazas: The discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Osborn, not on this page. Djflem (talk) 04:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Every major new outlet has been calling him a dark horse. Who even sent it for deletion? Nohorizonss (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Policy positions

edit

On October 15, 2024, a paragraph was inserted by davefelmer stating a bunch of policy/platform positions. Several of these (e.g. raising the Federal Minimum Wage and protecting abortion rights) are notably absent from the candidate's own platform page. No citations were added in that change, and as far as I can tell, no existing citations back up these claims. For the moment, I'm going to add a citation needed tag. (If I can remember how that works.)DoctorCaligari (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

While not all are on the campaign website, they have been cited in sources throughout the article body, and are listed in the body. Davefelmer (talk) 00:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. There are no cited sources on those positions. Please add them. Until that's done, I'm adding the citation needed tag back. Please do not remove.
I'll remove the paragraph in a couple of days if citations are not provided.DoctorCaligari (talk) DoctorCaligari (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Here's how I see it.
The policy paragraph in the lede should have substantiating details in the rest of the article. The substantiating details should have RS citations.
For one example, as is, the lede says that he supports guaranteeing access to abortion, but that isn't mentioned in the rest of the article (nor is it provided a direct citation in the lede). Show of good faith, I made the effort to find substantiation of that in various citations. I found one in the KETV Town Hall video (yes, you actually have to watch the video, but it's there) around nine minutes in when directly asked about his abortion position, he unequivocally states that he supports Federal legislation establishing "the Roe v Wade standard" as law, and he specifically mentions "up to viability". I propose addition of a paragraph to the article explaining it like that and footnoting the KETV citation. Then in the lede there would be a standalone sentence "he has stated he supports statutory protection of abortion access at the Federal level" or something like that. (I'd start on that now if I weren't already late for work.)DoctorCaligari (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply