This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Dance Theatre of Harlem's Firebird is reset in the Caribbean and considered (at least by DTH) to be a completely independent work credited to Taras; should this be indicated here, in Firebird and in John Taras? — Robert Greer (talk) 23:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
For the record, I have attempted to communicate a few of Wikipedia's guidelines by offering links to policies and guidelines in my edit summaries. The exhaustice redlinked lists that are being inserted are in violation of multiple policies. Please read WP:RS, WP:V, WP:WTAF and WP:NOTADIRECTORY. I will place this message on your talk page, along with a welcome message of useful links. These edits, unless supported by reliable sources, will be removed, as will exhaustive lists of members. Scr★pIronIV21:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Francisjohnlawrence: The information you have been adding does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Rather than continuing to add it, you should consider reading your talk page and this page to discuss. Thank you. Scr★pIronIV13:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a lot of focus on Arthur mitchell and his work throughout the majority of the page rather than focus on the achievements and history on the company. Some of the information seems like it could go on his personal wikipedia page. Maria Habenero (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply