Talk:Dancing in the Dark (Bruce Springsteen song)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Binksternet in topic Cover Versions

Music Video Alternate Version

edit

I have seen a version shot from the point of view of Courtney Cox's boyfriend/date. He leaves to buy her a soft drink, and is not allowed back on the floor. He watches Courtney climb onstage and dance from the back of the theatre. Can anyone provide details of this version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.253.131.180 (talk) 19:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Name changed

edit

I have changed the name from "Dancing in the Dark" to "Dancing In The Dark" only because I noticed on Bruce Springsteen's official website that that is the correct capitalization of the song's name. Here is the link for proof: http://www.brucespringsteen.net/albums/bornintheusa.html --Jesant13 (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Billy Joel

edit

The similarities of this song and Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire" seem striking to me. In particular, the feel of the opening rhythm of both songs and the phrases "can't start a fire" and "We didn't start the fire" seem so close. Is there any documentation on whether this song had an influence on Joel's?Kdammers (talk) 05:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

What about Courtney Cox

edit

Is there some reason why there is no mention the video featured the then unknown Courtney Cox? __209.179.0.121 (talk) 04:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Maybe because it's not very important. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Not sure why you'd say that, but if it's true, then why haven't you deleted "the 'Courteney Cox' dance" line from the article? It makes no sense out of context to those readers who don't know what it refers to. __209.179.0.121 (talk) 03:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dancing in the Dark (Bruce Springsteen song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Release date

edit

We had a release date of May 26, 1984, this was actually the date this song entered the Billboard charts (at no 36); it was in top 10 two weeks later the other release date we had was May 3, 1984, and several internet sites copied our information, which is something we should always be aware of when posting data I have serious problem with this date; the correct date should be at least 2 weeks later. It would never take 23 days between release and chart for Springsteen I have all the Billboard records, I will compare the two data points for his other singles, and some other artists I am scanning my 48 Bruce Springsteen books for information on this; Unfortunately, much easier to get recording info than release info David Tilson benchwarrant17@yahoo.com Please contact me with any clues or additional points of view PS I changed date to May 1984 for now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tillywilly17 (talkcontribs) 16:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Additional Information The 12" single was released May 9, 1984 and was the biggest selling 12" single in the U.S.A. that year. Not sure if this is the same release date. Back in these days, we did not yet have CD singles, full-size CDs were coming or just started (have to look it up) so we still had 7" 45rpm singles, right? I will check, all this off top of my head

The first commercially released CD Single was Angeline by John Martyn released on 1 February 1986.[3]

Although 7 inches remained the standard size for vinyl singles, 12-inch singles were introduced for use by DJs in discos in the 1970s. The longer playing time of these singles allowed the inclusion of extended dance mixes of tracks. In addition, the larger surface area of the 12-inch discs allowed for wider grooves (larger amplitude) and greater separation between grooves, the latter of which results in less cross-talk. Consequently, they are less susceptible to wear and scratches. The 12-inch single is still considered a standard format for dance music, though its popularity has declined in recent years.

May 3 might end up being correct, too bad person who entered that did not cite source! Tillywilly17 (talk) 17:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


May 3 is correct. I already got in trouble! bye see you next problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tillywilly17 (talkcontribs) 02:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Recent hatnote and reversion

edit

See related discussion at Talk:Dancing in the Dark (Howard Dietz and Arthur Schwartz song)#Hatnotes-recent edits. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cover Versions

edit

This article is incomplete without a section listing the most important COVER VERSIONS of this song.

Among them is the incredible rendition by Hot Chip. 173.176.50.117 (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The guideline WP:SONGCOVER sets the bar very high. Hot Chip's version doesn't appear at the Billboard chart history webpage. But coverage in Financial Times and Rolling Stone helps to get it included. Binksternet (talk) 05:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply