Talk:Dani California/GA1
GA Reassessment
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): 
c (OR):
- There is a serious shortage of references, to the point where it is sometimes unclear what are the sources for direct quotes.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- There is no section on composition. There is a short paragraph on the music under "Origins and character", but this is entirely lacking in references.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Since no significant improvements have been made to the article over the last week, I will now delist it. Lampman (talk) 23:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)