Talk:Daniel Mann (lawyer)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Bearian in topic Which lawyer?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment
editI know that reading through all the Guantanamo documents is a tremendous amount of work -- even if one didn't do any analysis. And I applaud Mr Mann and his colleagues for it.
I think however, in the current climate, the information solely about Mr Mann should be merged into a new section of the Seton Hall Center for Policy and Research devoted to its founders and fellows.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Which lawyer?
editIt is not clear that the lawyer who got the toilet seat settlement is the same attorney who is at Seton Hall. Bearian (talk) 21:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)