Talk:Daniel McCaffery
Latest comment: 8 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Daniel McCaffery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Daniel McCaffery won the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election after pledging to protect the right to an abortion? Source: A Pennsylvania Supreme Court candidate who ran on abortion rights, Daniel McCaffery, also won
- ALT1: ... that Daniel McCaffery supported abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues? Source: [1]
- ALT2: ... that Daniel McCaffery campaigned on protecting abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues?
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is my first DYK, so please excuse any errors in the nomination!
Created by HouseBlaster (talk). Self-nominated at 21:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Daniel McCaffery; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting: - Note: Main hook is a bit like a news item, but I find ALT1 interesting enough.
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Approved for ALT1. I would maybe change "supported" for "campaigned on" or "explicitly campaigned on". That has sourcing in the article to support. Up to you Acebulf (talk | contribs) 03:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Acebulf: Hi! Not really sure what the next steps are (again, first time doing this). I think I like the wording
that Daniel McCaffery campaigned on protecting abortion rights in the 2023 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, even though judicial candidates typically avoid commenting on specific issues?
; thoughts on that version? HouseBlastertalk 23:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)- That wording is great! On the process, now that it's been approved someone will pick it up and place it in one of the staging areas, and then it will be on the front page. I don't know that either of us has anything left to do. Cheers! Acebulf (talk | contribs) 01:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, I have added it as ALT2! HouseBlastertalk 04:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- That wording is great! On the process, now that it's been approved someone will pick it up and place it in one of the staging areas, and then it will be on the front page. I don't know that either of us has anything left to do. Cheers! Acebulf (talk | contribs) 01:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)