Talk:Danielle Valore Evans

Latest comment: 18 hours ago by 65.92.246.77 in topic Requested move 6 November 2024
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Danielle Valore Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 November 2024

edit

– Sole Wikipedia entry for an author whose pen name is Danielle Evans, not the full "Danielle Valore Evans", as confirmed by the eight inline cites under her section header "References" as well as five links under "External links". The only other entry upon the currently existing Danielle Evans disambiguation page is for model Dani Evans who is referenced as "Dani", not "Danielle", by the four inline cites under her section header "Sources" as well as three links under "External links". A hatnote atop each woman's entry pointing to the other should suffice. — Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 00:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply