Proposed merger of individual strait articles

edit

I've proposed a merger of the articles Great Belt, Little Belt and Øresund. This article is so small, the aforementioned articles aren't so huge as to need their own page.. -- Matthew Edwards | talk | Contribs 05:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

We honor your proposal. I understand, that you are in California. From there Denmark is very tiny, I guess. For us, I am German living at Lübeck, it is a real big difference, whether we have to cross one or the other of those straits you would like to include into one article. Also for history from the year 800 or so, we need each individual one of those straits linked to viking tours. So we better leave everything as it is and think about deletion of the Danish straits. Or even better: we both leave to the Danish, what they want to merge or to delete, ok?--Kresspahl 20:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ha ha, I am in California, yes, but I am English and have been to Denmark, and in no way find it to be tiny, or insignificant, or anything else. And I visit Germany a lot too (I'm a big fan of Borussia Dortmund). I'm in no way one of those American types who don't realise there are countries at the other side of the water! Anyway, I appreciate what you are saying regarding keeping the articles as they are, and perhaps a deletion of this article may be a better idea. -- Matthew Edwards | talk | Contribs 21:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply