Talk:Danny Hellman

The following portions of the "Danny Hellman" Wikipedia listing are inaccurate

I've copied the following from User talk:Dannyhellman. —Cleared as filed. 22:45, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

---

In the interest of helping you folks maintain accurate information, I would like to point out several untruths in the "Danny Hellman" Wikipedia listing:

1. "Danny Hellman, is a freelance illustrator and cartoonist whose illustrations have been printed in publications including New York Press, The Brutarian, Seventeen, WIZARD, A John L. Roberson fanzine, and Wet Snatch Illustrated."

(I've never contributed artwork to Seventeen, Wizard, A John L. Roberson fanzine, Wet Snatch Illustrated; as far as I know, there is no such publication as "Wet Snatch Illustrated").

2."There's much question as to whether many of the better artists included were fully aware of the cause they were supporting (ie. Hellman's rights to impersonate others without ever clearly defining it as a "prank"). Ultimately many cartoonists saw the Rall/Hellman dispute in the purely black & white terms of a more famous and well-funded cartoonist (Rall) overreacting to a harmless prank and taking legal action against a less well-healed and well-known cartoonist(Hellman). Still none of the contributing artists seem anxious to have similar "pranks" played on them."

(anyone with half a brain can see that this paragraph is entirely subjective and biased; I would say it is more "disinformative" than "informative." I should point out to the Wiki editors that I've been invovled in a contentious libel suit with another cartoonist since 1999; my opponent has frequently sought to publish false and defamatory information about me, and I suspect that the ongoing vandalism to this Wiki page is merely the latest chapter in an ongoing saga of idiocy)

3."While he initially claimed the comic would not specifically address Rall's lawsuit, many of the contributors did anyway, and Hellman himself drew an illustration of a small dog with Rall's likeness urinating on a statue of Spiegelman."

(there is no "illustration of a small dog with Rall's likeness" in either of my LEGAL ACTION COMICS books. The drawing to which this anonymous pinhead refers appeared in an issue of NEW YORK PRESS sometime in the Summer of 1999).

Now then, for the umpteenth time, I would like to provide you with ACCURATE information about my work. The following two paragraphs are factually true, (as opposed to the defamatory horsehit you folks insist on restoring over and over again).

Danny Hellman has worked as a commercial artist since the late 1980s. His illustrations have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Time, Fortune, Sports Illustrated, NYPress, The Wall Street Journal, FHM, Mad Magazine & Screw. Hellman’s comics work can be seen in DC Comics’ BIZARRO WORLD, Paradox Press’ BIG BOOKS series, LAST GASP COMICS & STORIES, and elsewhere.

Hellman is also the editor/publisher of the comics anthologies LEGAL ACTION COMICS Volumes 1 & 2, which featured work by R. Crumb, art spiegelman, Kim Deitch, Tony Millionaire, and many other cartoon talents.

Dannyhellman 22:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

---

I have incoporated many of these suggestions into the article. We welcome your help to continue improving this article and others. Wikipedia is committed to providing accurate information from a neutral point of view. ike9898 20:20, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

copied the following from User talk:Dannyhellman

You should lose the bit about "including employers of Rall." Forgive me for getting nitpicky about the details of this ridiculous lawsuit, but the truth is that, out of the thirty or so folks who received the joke email, only one person would qualify as "Rall's employer," and even that description is not entirely accurate. As we discovered in a deposition, Nicholas Blechman, an art director at the New York Times, (as well as the publisher of a comic book titled "Nozone") had hired Rall a few times after taking over at the Times Op Ed page, but had long since stopped using Rall's work by the time of the joke email. If accuracy is what you're after here, you should say the email went to "one former employer of Rall's." It's misleading to suggest to readers that the email went to multiple employers of Rall's.Dannyhellman 03:09, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

User:Dannyhellman is really Danny Hellman

I have contacted Danny Hellman independent of Wikipedia and I can confirm that User:Dannyhellman is who he claims to be. ike9898 15:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

The endless reversion on this page

If the issues that keep getting reverted back and forth can't be resolved by refering to verifiable sources, then we will have to cut out that whole part of the article. Can someone provide some references? ike9898 19:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I have provided a source for the dismissals. Four of five of Rall's claims were dismissed. See The Comics Journal [1] (unsigned comments from 24.175.27.94)

There's an apparent factula dispute here between the above user & someone else. I have revereted to the version with the citation and marked as a disputed item. To resolve the dispute, the editor should provide some other citation that contradicts the previous one. C00kiemons 18:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't see any disputed facts here; I have reverted the text a couple of times in the last few days to correct vandalism. Perhaps the same idiot who's responsible for the vandalism is making the claim of factual dispute in order to mess with this page...? Dannyhellman 22:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the disputye tag as the party on one side of the endless reversions has failed to explain his or her edits. The current version should be considered the consensus version, and future edits ought to be explained here. C00kiemons 15:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Is this person really notable enough for his/her own article?

I motion to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drunkenmonkey111 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 23 June 2009

He certainly is, among comics fans at least. If you want this article deleted, you must go through the AFD process. Rhinoracer (talk) 08:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I also note that you have vandalised this page, so I can only conclude that you are acting in bad faith here. Please cease. Rhinoracer (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I notice you're a French translator - how are you doing (redacted) - still sticking up for your best pal Hellman I see. you know he thinks you're Vap? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drunkenmonkey111 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 24 June 2009

Please do not post other editors' supposed real names here. This is considered to be a form of harassment and can result in being blocked from editing. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Danny Hellman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060505022554/http://www.tcj.com/236/n_danse.html to http://www.tcj.com/236/n_danse.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091215123901/http://www.rall.com:80/2005/02/worlds-stupidest-people.html to http://www.rall.com/2005/02/worlds-stupidest-people.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)