Talk:Danny Sullivan (technologist)/Archives/2016
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Danny Sullivan (technologist). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notability
I removed the notability tag after the subject contacted me to complain. Having a Wikipedia page about somebody and saying "this person is a nobody" with a big orange message at the top is rude. If @Andy Dingley: or anybody else wants to nominate the page for deletion, that's fine with me, but the matter should be decided. We shouldn't keep Mr. Sullivan in the purgatory of having a biography that brands him "non notable". Either he's notable or he isn't. Jehochman Talk 12:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I agree. Danny has been the singular voice of SEO and social media journalism for over two decades..
(note Before Social Media, possibly pre-wikipedia?) Can we end this issue..
also.. change technologist to journalist... I have read his writings for over two decades.. he isn't a gadget guy.
Please. Thanks. I probably know more about him than any human not related to him. This is the Search Engine journalist equal to Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, Walter Cronkite.Talk
[1]
Here are references.
http://daggle.com/danny-sullivan-quoted
Danny truly IS the journalist for a BILLION dollar industry... the first and the most credible.. if anyone is in wikipedia it should be Danny.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.119.155.229 (talk) 21:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)