Talk:Kim Hong-do

Untitled

wish list:

• actually born in Ansan?
• why don't we know when he died?
• did he really sneak over to Tsushima and copy a map of Japan?

File:Kim Hong-do Danwon.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kim Hong-do Danwon.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Date of death

This article says 1806, but page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_painting#Joseon_Dynasty says "1818?"

The Turkish article says 1806

The French article says "1806, but perhaps 1816 or 1818".

The Korean article says "1806년 이전" i.e. 1806 or earlier in the introduction, and 1816 to 1818 in the side-frame

What says the rest of the web ?

• Britannica avoids. British Museum avoids.

• Page "http://atelier.de.francais.over-blog.com/article-23729522.html" (Chungbuk National University, South Korea) says 1805, may be later.

• https://www.koreana.or.kr:444/months/news_view.asp?b_idx=389&lang=en&page_type=list (The Korean Foundation is affiliated with the South-Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs) says 1806.

• http://www.flickr.com/photos/89235234@N00/8375219455/ says Kim Hong-do 1745-1814 ... musée Guimet (Paris, France)

As usual, none of these assertions (except from the last one) is backed by any quotation, and no one is discussing about the discrepancy 1805-1818.

An indication could be Yi Ki-baek (New History of Korea, p246) that asserts : "the popularity of genre painting constitued an artistic protest against yangban Confucian society, an assertion of the worth of all humanity".

Pldx1 (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gim Hongdo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203023108/http://preview.britannica.co.kr/bol/topic.asp?article_id=b03g2103b to http://preview.britannica.co.kr/bol/topic.asp?article_id=b03g2103b
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150713220732/http://gongu.copyright.or.kr/search/search.do?kwd=%EA%B9%80%ED%99%8D%EB%8F%84&fGroup=02&fLicCode=&authorSeq= to http://gongu.copyright.or.kr/search/search.do?kwd=%EA%B9%80%ED%99%8D%EB%8F%84&fGroup=02&fLicCode=&authorSeq=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 12 July 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move these articles as a group; please initiate individual move requests as necessary. Dekimasuよ! 16:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

---

• Gim Hongdo → Kim Hong-do
• Gim Jongjik → Kim Jong-jik
• Gim Busik → Kim Bu-sik
• Gim Yu-sin → Kim Yu-sin

– They are Korean historic figures. WP:Naming conventions (Korean) says that Revised Romanization of Korean should be used for no established English spelling. Gim and not hyphenating the syllables of given names, e.g. Gim Hongdo, Gim Jongjik, Gim Busik, and Gim Yusin, comply with Revised Romanization system. But Kim (Korean surname) and hyphenating are very common in the real world. @Garam and Brett Cox: This needs movers' opinions. Thank you. Sawol (talk) 07:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

• Comment. Here's the full list of articles about Korean people with surname Gim obtained by prefix search,

On a quick skim, 95% of those are historical figures indeed. Per the Revised Romanization, this surname should be romanized as "Gim", but it is expressly listed as an exception under WP:NCKO#Family name. For the full picture, WP:NCKO prefaces that Personal, organization, and company names should generally be romanized according to their common usage in English sources, thus allowing for exceptions. I don't have an opinion on the substance of this RM. No such user (talk) 08:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I advertized this RM at WikiProject Korea [1]. No such user (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for digging all Gim. Please erase five items:

• Gim Allon: not Korean
• Gim Bo-eun: living people, English sources Gim Bo-eun#References
• Gim So-hui: living people, English sources Gim So-hui#References
• Gim Toro: not Korean
• Gim Un-chi: living people, English sources Gim Un-chi#External links

And English sources for living people Gim Gu-ra and Gim Seong-ju (presenter) would be found. There is no problem with Kim vs Gim. I recommend that problems with Gu-ra vs Gura and Seong-ju vs Sung-joo are solved at their respective talk pages. Sawol (talk) 09:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I brought the list here mostly for information; they weren't part of the original nomination. Nonetheless, I struck the five you mentioned. While this RM technically could mandate move of all of them, they would be probably best discussed case-by-case or batch by batch, as mass nominations often turn into a mess. No such user (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

• WP:NCKO and Revised Romanization of Korean #1 (Korean) do not say that a hyphen is required anywhere. And the spelling "Kim" is Korean surname based on McCune–Reischauer Romanization. But many historic Korean name is based on Revised Romanization of Korean such as "Gang" of Gang Isik. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 08:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose. If Wikipedia's style guide is to be contravened, do it on a case-by-case basis supported by sources. —  AjaxSmack  01:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.