Talk:Daphne Loves Derby
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI added some information onto the page. I tried to add the citations but it lists suite101 as a blacklisted website. I don't know how to properly cite it now, aside from excluding a letter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.225.13 (talk) 05:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, there are cache problems.... but, before March 30 there are some edits of this that have content that I restored. If someone can look at them an integrate them before I forget that would be nice. gren グレン 02:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Emo
editWhat characteristics of emo does this band have? I don't hear any emo elements in their songs. - Kame2000 01:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- then you didn't hear their songs. ~ 69.153.89.138 (talk) 00:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
The last part about how the name came to be needs serious revision. Some parts contradict each other, and the capitalization is at about an elementary level. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.132.18.122 (talk) 02:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Emo? no no no there genres should be indie rock (look it up) and acoustic and i guess alternative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.64.155 (talk) 02:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Background
editI would vote that the background of the band be changed to be more objective. They are not solely a band ON PureVolume, and some of the adjectives used are a bit too subjective, like "flamboyantly" and "swimmingly" is very opinionated. I would motion to have more objective vocabulary in place of what is there. Angel of Anubis (talk) 07:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daphne Loves Derby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070525150349/http://community.livejournal.com/daphne_n_dizzle/ to http://community.livejournal.com/daphne_n_dizzle/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daphne Loves Derby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524010900/http://www.alternativeaddiction.com/newmusic/exec/albumreviews.asp?id=369 to http://www.alternativeaddiction.com/newmusic/exec/albumreviews.asp?id=369
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)