Talk:Daphne de Jong

(Redirected from Talk:Daphne deJong)
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Wpnw85 in topic Unreliable sources and notability

Requested move 10 July 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


Daphne deJongDaphne de Jong – The name was misspelled: her surname contains a space between “de” and “Jong”. Monda (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Good idea. Do you happen to know how to do this given that the exact same name is already taken? 83.25.57.9 (talk) 13:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggest to proceed and change to Daphne de Jong

edit

based on the feedback, I suggest to proceed with the proposal. What's the next step? 83.25.127.20 (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

A pagemover should handle this soon, as we are nearing seven days from the opening of the RM. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unreliable sources and notability

edit

The majority of this article relies on self-published (LinkedIn) and unreliable (Forbes list) sources. It looks like the removal of these sources may bring back earlier discussion of notability and conflict of interest. However, it looks like the user who first created this article (User:Justynazander) is now banned.

See WP:RSPLINKEDIN on issues using LinkedIn as a source.

See WP:FORBESCON on issues using Forbes lists as a source.

I suggest either adding the following to the article or nominating for deletion.

Wpnw85 (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply