Talk:Daqing station

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alishan Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Undue weight

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Ganbaruby: Please edit according to WP:WEIGHT. Daqing is not a railway and metro station, it is a railway station planned to have metro services added in the future. The diagram is not the station layout, it is the planned station layout in the future, which is way less relevant than the current layout. This page has two infoboxes with equal detail. Are both services in operation? If a service is not yet open, does it warrant the succession box? Ythlev (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ythlev: I just thought it might be useful information to the reader. If you really think it should be gone, I'm fine with it too; we'll just add it back in December. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (talk to me) 15:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic