Talk:Darcy Tucker

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sleeper1313.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Consideration for status as a pest

In my view, Tucker may be considered a pest. I am a Sabres fan, however, so do not have a NPOV. Therefore, offering this as a topic of discussion before adding any commentary. Marimvibe 02:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I'd agree with that statement.--E tac 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

As a fellow Sabres fan, agreed entirely... Also, I removed the title "Fucker and Pecker" from the article, and replaced it with Tucker and Peca. I assume it was simply vandalism. AlexRochon 21:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Darcy Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080731121654/http://slam.canoe.ca:80/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Colorado/2008/07/01/6036936-cp.html to http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Colorado/2008/07/01/6036936-cp.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Darcy Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917203812/http://ahlhalloffame.com/dudley-red-garrett-memorial-award-p139049 to http://ahlhalloffame.com/dudley-red-garrett-memorial-award-p139049

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Critiquing an Article - Darcy Tucker

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - I believe that the fact that Darcy Tucker is Metis is underrepresented in this article. It is mentioned once and that is it. There is no mention of the community he is from, his aboriginal background or any information towards the culture. Being Metis is a major part of some people's lives and is not a fact that should be overlooked about players. Compared to some of the stats about his playing career that seem to be irrelevant to the article, and are discussed thoroughly, his Metis status is not discussed nearly enough.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? - There is a point in the article that references a hit that Tucker made, during the playoffs one year against the Islanders, that seems unnecessary. It just mentions that the hit made Tucker known in Long Island and then gives details on the injuries Mike Peca (the receiving player endured). This information is fairly irrelevant because Tucker was a fairly well known name in the NHL and one hit he made should not describe his career. It then discusses how Michael Peca came to Toronto to play for a few years, which does not have anything to do with Tucker's career unless you are discussing every player he ever played with. There is also no reference points to where the information regarding the hit can be found. Other than this, the article is fairly well organized and not distracting. It flows smoothly from his playing career, to his personal life, to his career statistics and awards.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - The article is neutral. There are no real claims that show bias towards a particular position or Tucker in particular. The article mainly describes his background as a junior player and where he grew up. It then gets into his playing career and statistics. There is no info showing bias towards any plays that he made, teams that he played for, or himself. It is clearly written from a neutral standpoint that cannot be seen as a bias source.

Sleeper1313 (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)