Talk:Darken's equations

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gladamas in topic Expert review

Biography section

edit

The section Biography should be removed since it doesn't fit with the topic of the page. The whole thing seems a celebration of this scientist.

Above comment 3 April 2015‎ by 78.12.184.208.

I have now transferred the Biography section to the new article Lawrence Stamper Darken. Dirac66 (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Expert review

edit

Proposition:

The Darken equation has been widely accepted for a long time in the concerned fields. In relation to the coordinate transformation of diffusion equation and quantum effect on the elementary process of diffusion, recently some epoch-making innovations of fundamental theory of diffusion have been established [1]. In that situation, it was revealed that the concept of intrinsic diffusion coefficient itself is nonexistent in the basic of mathematical physics for the interdiffusion phenomena, and further that the Darken equation is mathematically wrong in its derivation process [2]. Thus, it is extremely meaningful that the Darken equation should be introduced as one of misunderstanding examples in science because of historical lesson for younger people, or it is believed that the item “Darken equation” should be removed from the WikipediA presentation.

[1] Takahisa Okino, Quantum Effect on Elementary Process of Diffusion and Collective Motion of Brown Particles, J. Modern Physics 2018, 1007-1028.

[2] Takahisa Okino, Ending of Darken Equation and Intrinsic Diffusion Concept, J. Modern Physics 2013, 1495-1498.

                                 The responsibility for the wording of the sentence.
                                     Professor emeritus Oita University, Japan.
                                                Takahisa Okino
                                               okino@oita-u.ac.jp
Moved from mainspace –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply