This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dartmouth Castle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Comments
This is in excellent shape; minor things to work on:
possibly link Godmerock if there is a chance an article will eventuate.
In the 16th-18th centuries section; "an instruction known as a device in 1544...". It is probably not necessary to reference the form of the instruction (device) or the year, which is already established the previous sentence.
NCOs probably should be recited in full, I suspect that not all readers will be familiar with the term.
Other than the above, the text reads well, and is properly cited. The article is neutral in tone and stable. Nicely illustrated, image tags have been checked and all seem appropriate. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
