Talk:Data management plan

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Evolution and evolvability in topic Generalisation and internationalisation

Problematic claims

edit

The article is slanted in a very DMP positive direction, making unsupported claims about the efficacy of DMPs. I would welcome a discussion about how to improve the article so it reflects current research on the subject while still acknowledging the various DMP requirements and mandates from funders and universities. More references to published research would be great! (I have modified some of the most brazen claims about DMP benefits.) --Glitterspont (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Request for edits

edit

I work for the Digital Curation Centre and in particular I'm a developer on the DMPonline tool for creating DMPs. I think it would be useful to add a section on DMP tools (DMPonline and the already-referenced DMPTool), though it would be a conflict of interest for me to add that myself. --Paddy (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Source for idealized DMP

edit
  • Miksa, Tomasz; Simms, Stephanie; Mietchen, Daniel; Jones, Sarah (February 13, 2018). "Ten simple rules for machine-actionable data management plans (preprint)". doi:10.5281/zenodo.1172673. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

Generalisation and internationalisation

edit

Though a common issue across WP, it's best if US items are used as examples, rather than the entirety of the article. Could be useful to draw more heavily from the international Research Data Alliance. Topics covered include:

T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply