 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Burzum DaudiBaldrs.jpg
edit
Image:Burzum DaudiBaldrs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Reception
editI've removed the Sputnik review as I don't think it meets the criterias for a professional review. The author focuses too much on Burzum as a person and not as an artist by calling him "crazed neo-nazi, church burning murderer", which clearly shows a personal dislike for Vikernes, thus making the review subjective and useless. The entire review is just written badly and distasteful, so why was it put under Professional review tab? I don't mind the low score as long as I can be given some detailed rational. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UsernameIsNotTaken (talk • contribs) 08:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I've restored it; SputnikMusic is a notable music site, and probably one of the few notable sites that bothered reviewing this album. You don't get to pick and choose reviews that conform to your opinion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)