Talk:Daughtry discography

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

UK Chart positions?

edit

I find some of these positions hard to believe, particularly No Surprise peaking at #10 on the UK charts? Can we have a source for this? I've checked the release dates of the download and cross referenced with the Official Charts Company's archive and can find no place for them in the Top 40? Can someone indicate which week it peaked in? Home and What About Now are the only two I can remember charting...79.69.255.225 (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Someone seriously has to stop posting that the album has sold over 10 million albums or whatever. Daughtry is big in the U.S. and has sold 4 million albums there which would represent the bulk of his sales because the U.S. is the biggest market in the world by a vast amount and most of his fans are from American Idol which only airs in a few other nations. His peak positions for the album are all relatively low outside the U.S. as well, so clearly it would not be possible for Daughtry to sell 6-8 million records in foreign markets, especially with those peak positions. Plus, there is no real source, the link here is only to a fansite that simply writes "is said to have sold" without any citations either, it's not reliable at all. If anything, they picked it ouf from here because someone wants people to think Daughtry is a worldwide phenomenon. Same thing goes for his singles sales as well. 14 million point sales worldwide? From what I understand that is twice as much as the current record of 7 million worldwide, and that record goes to 'Apologize'. I've changed these laughable claims several times yet people continue to change it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.188.233 (talk) 05:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Leave This Town performance

edit

Could anybody offer any clarity as to why Leave This Town keeps being marked as reaching #1 on the Billboard Top 200? I saw a press release saying that it had, but Billboard says Blacksummersnight is #1 this week [1]. Am I missing something? — Bdb484 (talk) 17:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fake chart entries

edit

This is a repeat of a message I posted in Adam Lambert dicography discussion page, but the same message applies here.

Someone here has been persistently making fake chart entries in Adam Lambert and Daughtry pages. While in normal circumstances such a person would be issued with warning and ultimately banned, it is not practical in this case because the person uses a dynamic IP whereby the IP address changes every time he or she logs on, and it is in reality impossible to ban because the ISP is the biggest in the UK - BT which has millions of subscribers. I think however any edit by this person should be automatically considered suspect and reverted if figures given are not sourced correctly. The IP address this person uses may be in the range

  • 81.135.0.0 - 81.135.127.255
  • 81.154.0.0 - 81.157.255.255
  • 86.128.0.0 - 86.135.255.255
  • 86.148.0.0 - 86.159.255.255
  • 86.160.0.0 - 86.171.255.255

and likely many others, but all pointing to the ISP BT-CENTRAL-PLUS.

It should be noted of course since there are millions of users from this ISP, not everyone who edits this or other Adam and Daughtry pages would necessary be the same person, but all entries made from this ISP for the Adam and Daughtry pages should be checked for accuracy.

We don't really want a situation where Adam Lambert and Daughtry pages become a joke where all entries are automatically suspect because of one person's action (in one Daughtry's chart table, practically all the entries were faked). Please help keep this and other Daughtry's pages to a reasonable standard by making sure that all entries are correct and that any further attempt by this vandal to make fake entries be reverted. Hzh (talk) 14:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daughtry discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply