 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Image copyright problem with Image:Transplants- Diamonds and Guns.ogg
editThe image Image:Transplants- Diamonds and Guns.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Copyedit
editSpecifi issues are abbreviations per WP:ABBR and use of slashes per WP:SLASH. --Rogerb67 (talk) 00:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD tag without edit summary
editis not helpful; nor is removal of cleanup templates that clearly apply, again without summary or talk page comment. Given the lack of justification for removing PROD, this article is going straight to AfD under the same rationale. Perhaps that will elicit helpful comment. --Rogerb67 (talk) 10:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability
editStill tagged with notability - looks like the decision was keep. Can this be removed on main page? Ward99 (talk) 02:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- As this was discussed and the decision was keep, and the original tagger hasn't responded to my question about why this was still tagged this way, I have removed. Please response here if you have a issue with this. Ward99 (talk) 21:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Useful sources for this article.
edit- http://www.visitshoremagazine.com/articles/2008/07/28/features/doc487e23e8cabf2450362273.txt
- http://www.eqmag.com/article/rogue-pogue/oct-05/14512
- http://www.bentonspiritnews.com/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=103&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=1779&wpage=1&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=1935&hn=bentonspiritnews&he=.com