Talk:Daventry

Is the mention in the McDonalds ad really as good as it gets in Daventry? Please tell me something more noteworthy has happened there...? -- Francs2000 | Talk 01:56, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

The first experiment with Radar was carried out there, and the BBC World Service used to be broadcast from there, how about that?. Daventry's a pleasant enough town but "Daventry" and "exciting" are unfortunately not two words that are often found together in a sentence. G-Man 22:37, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Just returned from there. The Country Park IS quite nice, but I second you on the "exciting" part. Found a nice pub though so I saved some money on the expensive hotel food... --Pmkpmk 21:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

its not the worst place in the world to live, i must admit and most of the people are pretty freindly 86.140.74.46 22:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Saw something on BBC News today (26/09/2007) on a new kind of driver-less taxi being trialed at Daventry. Someone want to include it in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.133.254 (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

It should be noted that the Moot Hall, which was the town's museum, was converted into an Indian restaurant called The Moot Hall Indian in 2006. The place seems to do better trade than its main rival, Papadoms. But this maybe on account of the latter being situated directly above a funeral directors.

Alex, former Daventry resident of 16 years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.124.225.66 (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

"In 2006 the Outdoor pool, funded by residents of Daventry after children drowned in the local resevoir, was closed due to lack of cash for upkeep. In 2007 Daventry began plans to modernise the town ... to increase shops and tourism with non-existant historical features. These ideas have caused much controversy with the majority of residents strongly opposing the plans, claiming it is a waste of money and contradicts the reasoning of the outdoor pool's existance and closure. Nevertheless, the plans continue to go ahead regardless of what the public thinks." Sounds like a disgruntled local resident. I got rid of the "non-existant historical features" and "regardless of what the public thinks" and changed "podcar" to personal rapid transit which is the real name of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.161.12 (talk) 00:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

The swimming pool section is still tendentious and I have made the tone neutral. Afterbrunel (talk) 17:06, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Daventry in the English Civil War

Added a bit more detail about Daventry's role in the ECW and what happened afterwards (it directs leads to the Battle of Naseby) - including the well-known legend about Charles I being visited by a ghost at the Wheatsheaf Inn Praise God Barebones (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Pronounciation

In Eric Partridge's wonderful book Usage and Abusage. A Guide to Good English, he notes the old pronounciations of various places in England. One of these is Daventry - and he states that it was once common (especially locally) to pronounce it as dane-tree. Perhaps this is worth noting in the main article?! Hair Commodore (talk) 14:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daventry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303194320/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-07-12/Writtens-14.html to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199495/cmhansrd/1995-07-12/Writtens-14.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Suggestions for improvement

Thinking of ways to improve this article. I would say that much of the material on the parish church and moot hall etc be moved to their own articles, with a summary on the main article, which would be in a new section called say 'Notable buildings and landmarks' created to list the town's more notable buildings. G-13114 (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Attempts to use Wikipedia to promote the idea of another station for Daventry at Weedon Bec

Although Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone may edit, it is a fundamental principle that it only contains credible, reliably sourced information. Among the many things that WP:Wikipedia is not, it is not a campaign or publicity platform. The wikipedia policy WP:Advocacy states:

Advocacy the use of Wikipedia to promote personal beliefs or agendas at the expense of Wikipedia's goals and core content policies, including verifiability and neutral point of view. Despite the popularity of Wikipedia, it is not a soapbox to use for editors' activism, recruitment, promotion, advertising, announcements, or other forms of advocacy.

If the idea of another station for Daventry (at Weedon Bec or wherever) ever attracts credible support – for example being adopted by West Northamptonshire Council as part of its formal transport objectives (which is being claimed but never cited) – then and only then can it go in the article. Wishes, dreams and fantasy railway stations do not belong in Wikipedia and will be deleted. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)