Talk:David Alderton
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Speedy deletion nomination
editThis should be discussed at AFD. I do not see how this article "does nothing but promote some entity or product and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic" and this authors books about pets and fish seem to make him sufficiently notable.--HighFlyingFish (talk) 07:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I agree that the page needs more sources and information. Here are some things I found. http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/nf/Author/AuthorPage/0,,1000052769,00.html and http://www.bookfinder.com/author/david-alderton/ (a list of his books on BookFinder).--HighFlyingFish (talk) 08:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I think that is is a case of improving the page rather than deleting it. Snowman (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I noted in the history that on the 4 April 2010 Snomanradio's edit summary included the words "(looks like copy vio from authors website, so deleted)". Oops - I misread those words, I thought he meant he had proposed the article for deletion, and it didn't help that on the 11th April David Alderton undid that revision. I will remove the Hangon template and work on the article. MarkDask 11:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- On that occasion, I deleted what looked like copy vio from the page. Snowman (talk) 11:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)