Talk:David Alexander Mulholland
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of David Alexander Mulholland be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editA few more pics.....Sarah777 (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Length, details
editThis article appears to be extraordinarily long and detailed, containing the entire account of the Dublin/Monaghan bombings, which have their own article, including a lot of speculation by journalist Tiernan. Ideas, anyone? Quis separabit? 02:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think it is too long. The problem with many articles on paramilitaries is that they are too short!! Tiernan's information has never been found faulty; indeed he was the main researcher for Yorkshire Television's The Hidden Hand programme which covered the Dublin and Monaghan bombings.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're right about the shortness of many paramilitary-related articles. But I think a problem is that, based on the volatile, contentious nature of the Troubles, the longer you make these articles based on fungible and/or one-sided and/or outdated sources, the more likely POV, OR, and partisanship are going to seep in. Quis separabit? 16:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- A lot of the info on Mulholland can be backed by the Barron Report, though.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, I get it. I was speaking in general. Yours, Quis separabit? 16:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- That is what the talk pages are for. It's good to get other people's feedback.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, I get it. I was speaking in general. Yours, Quis separabit? 16:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- A lot of the info on Mulholland can be backed by the Barron Report, though.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're right about the shortness of many paramilitary-related articles. But I think a problem is that, based on the volatile, contentious nature of the Troubles, the longer you make these articles based on fungible and/or one-sided and/or outdated sources, the more likely POV, OR, and partisanship are going to seep in. Quis separabit? 16:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Alexander Mulholland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619170035/http://www.seeingred.com/Copy/2.1_CODE_weiraff.html to http://www.seeingred.com/Copy/2.1_CODE_weiraff.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)