Talk:David Bernhardt
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Flooded with them hundreds in topic Requested move 17 December 2018
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 17 December 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 09:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
– It is clear from page views, article length, and general significance that the political figure who may succeed Zinke as Secretary of the Interior is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, not the ice hockey player who hasn't played a game in the NHL. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support both the nominator presents convincing evidence that the political figure is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Additionally, Google News searches make it clear that the political figure's WP:COMMONNAME does not include the middle initial [1][2]. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:51, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose first move to David Bernhardt (politician). Support second In ictu oculi (talk) 18:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: Are you suggesting the political figure, with the longer page and far more page views, isn't the primary topic? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Am saying NOPRIMARY. No long term proven significance for either. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support both moves since the politician per page views is as of now and most likely more so in the future the primary topic. JC7V (talk) 21:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per above. Davey2116 (talk) 19:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.