Talk:David Catania

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Bangabandhu in topic lims

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

legalization of same-sex marriage

edit

User:Nursenut has removed "expected" (along with reference formatting of the WaPo source) in the description of same-sex marriage in D.C.; but, although the D.C. Council passed legislation to legalize same-sex marriage, it's not technically legal until the congressional 30-day-review has passed. If Congress doesn't interfere, and once Mayor Fenty signs the legislation, same-sex marriage will then become legalized. Until that occurs, "expected" should remain in this article. APK whisper in my ear 05:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Expected" is no longer needed as the legistlation passed with a veto proof majority and as Congress did not interfere in the previous legistlation is unlikely to in this instance, so while it is not technically legal, it is factually legal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nursenut (talkcontribs) 19:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
The key word is "unlikely". I agree Congress is unlikely to interfere with the legislation, but encyclopedias should not predict what may or may not happen. Once it's technically legal – U.S. legal issues are always technical – the wording can be updated. APK whisper in my ear 00:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Josué L. Barbosa (talk) 03:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC) Please read the NY Times article writte 12/15/09 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/us/16marriage.html?_r=1. They too use the terminology that it is legalized. So if I add quotes and the reference to this article, you should not have an objection as it will be quoting a news source which is acceptable.Josué L. Barbosa (talk) 03:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
No, they don't. The New York Times article says (emphasis mine), "The City Council passed a measure Tuesday legalizing same-sex marriage, making the nation’s capital the first jurisdiction below the Mason-Dixon Line to allow such unions. The bill, which passed by an 11-to-2 vote, may still face obstacles in Congress, among city voters and in the courts, but most advocates of same-sex marriage say they expect it to become law by spring. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty has said he will sign the bill....Opponents have vowed to overturn the bill by putting it to a referendum or by working with Congress, which has a month to review the measure once it is signed."
Please read District of Columbia home rule. APK whisper in my ear 03:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
The first line states "The City Council passed a measure Tuesday legalizing same-sex marriage, making the nation’s capital the first jurisdiction below the Mason-Dixon Line to allow such unions." There is it, not expects, but a done deal. The rest is what can prevent it from happening. It is legal, it just can't be practiced.Josué L. Barbosa (talk) 00:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't know if you're a resident of Washington, D.C., but in case you aren't, Congress has ultimate jurisdiction over our city. I'm not sure why you're in such a rush to remove the word 'expected', but luckily, there is no deadline on Wikipedia. Until Congress reviews the legislation, same-sex marriages performed in Washington, D.C. are not legal. I've quoted The New York Times article, which explains the legal process, so there's no reason to remove 'expected'. APK whisper in my ear 00:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Regardless of my residence, I understand the process in DC. I do not understand your issue with my removal of the word. Marriage has been leaglized in the District. This is cannot be in dispute. Enforcement is delayed due to the process unique to DC, and my removal of the word is in good company.Josué L. Barbosa (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Catania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

pic

edit

one pic per page is the norm with good reason. I'm putting this pic here so its not lost forever. Bangabandhu (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
Catania in 2013

lims

edit

there's no reason to have every bill he sponsored or co-sponsored listed on his page. i'm putting it here.

Legislation

edit
  • B13.0193 Tax Parity Act of 1999
  • B13-0468 Comprehensive Advisory Neighborhood Commissions Reform Amendment Act of 2000
  • B13-0552 Workforce Investment Implementation Act of 2000
  • B13-0637 The Health Care Expansion Act of 2000
  • B13-0752 New E-Conomy Transformation Act of 2000
  • B14-0026 Child Support Enforcement Amendment Act of 2001
  • B14-0096 Medicaid Provider Fraud Prevention Amendment Act of 2001
  • B14-0600 Establishment of an Office of the District Attorney for the District of Columbia Charter Amendment Act of 2002
  • B17-0135 Omnibus Domestic Partnership Equality Amendment Act of 2008
  • B15-0436 Unemployment Compensation and Domestic Violence Amendment Act of 2003
  • B15-0886 School Accountability Amendment Act of 2004
  • B15-0888 Minimum Wage Amendment Act of 2004
  • B16-0088 District of Columbia Excel Institute Grant Authority Emergency Act of 2005
  • B16-0114 Prescription Drug Excessive Pricing Act of 2005
  • B16-0420 District of Columbia Health Professional Recruitment Program Act of 2005
  • B16-0421 Organ and Tissue Donor Registry Establishment Act of 2006
  • B17-0030 Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Reporting Act of 2007
  • B17-0092 Student Access to Treatment Act of 2007
  • B17-0135 Omnibus Domestic Partnership Equality Amendment Act of 2008
  • B17-0364 Safe RX Amendment Act of 2008
  • B17-0372 Effi Slaughter Barry HIV/AIDS Initiative Act of 2007
  • B17-0858 Adverse Event Reporting Requirement Amendment Act of 2008
  • B18-0481 Health Care Facilities Improvement Amendment Act of 2010
  • B18-0482 Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009
  • B18-0622 Legalization of Marijuana For Medical Treatment Amendment Act of 2009
  • B18-0642 Healthy DC Equal Access Fund and Hospital Stabilization Emergency Amendment Act of 2010
  • B18-0644 Haiti Earthquake Relief Drug and Medical Supply Assistance Emergency Act of 2010
  • B18-1003 Long Term Ombudsman Program Amendment Act of 2010
  • B19-0002 Health Benefit Exchange Authority Establishment Act of 2011
  • B19-0077 Pension Protection and Sustainability Amendment Act of 2011
  • B19-0211 South Capitol Street Memorial Amendment Act of 2012
  • B19-0305 Not-For-Profit Hospital Corporation Establishment Emergency Amendment Act of 2011
  • B19-0510 HIV/AIDS Continuing Education Requirements Amendment Act of 2012
  • B19-0524 Senior HIV/AIDS Education and Outreach Program Establishment Act of 2012
  • B19-0657 Collaborative Care Expansion Act of 2012

Bangabandhu (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply