This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'm not sure it makes sense to end the article by mentioning the fact that in 1977, Gauthier wrote a letter to a newspaper arguing that homosexuals should not be allowed to teach in schools. Such views were quite common back in 1977. Is there any evidence that he still adheres to such views, and is there any evidence that he has been involved in opposing gay rights beyond the publication of a single letter that he wrote almost forty years ago? If the answer to both questions is no, I recommend that the sentence in question be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.56.13.152 (talk) 08:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
The material in question is better cited than most material in the article. Why single it out for attention? You might as well ask whether there is any evidence that Gauthier still adheres to any of his other views as described in the article. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
