Talk:David H. Warren
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Methods and Career
edit"He also conducts the very atrocius experimentation on monkeys (http://www.britches.org.uk/story.asp) and he is more fame because of this than him studies or him discoveries." - edit by anonymous user, April 2012
"Blindness and Children: An Individual Differences Approach", which Warren wrote about ten years after the ALF raid, stands in stark contrast to the Harry Harlow styled animal experiments described in Britches_(monkey). Did the event have such a high impact on his future studies? What was his actual role in the experiments?
Warren IS listed as one of six co-authors of "Behavioral observations of sensory substitution in neonate macaques (Macaca arctoides)". The abstract refers to two other articles about monkey experiments, but none of them was authored by Warren himself. Warren is also listed as the principal investigator of "Trisensor Rearing With Infant Macaques" (09/30/1984 - 09/29/1987), a research project funded by the National Eye Institute. His book "Blindness and Early Childhood Development" on the other hand, which he wrote in 1984, isn't based on animal studies at all. He takes a totally different approach. This is weird.