This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The last paragraph added by 69.136.180.230 on 7 September 2010 should be removed. If the interview was conducted by the editor, it is original research and doesn't belong. If the interview is from another source, it needs to be cited. Even then I would vote for its removal simply because it contains, "uh," which is not consistent with the voice of wikipedia. Jmbrowne (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
If it's a direct quotation then the wording is apropriate enough. Although it needs sourcing. I am removing it as lacking sources. Taemyr (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply