Talk:David Pepper (politician)
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editSeems notable [1]. RasterFaAye (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Should we put every city councilman from every city on WP then just because they've been mentioned in the local paper a couple times? Please show some subjectivity otherwise WP will be overrun with every person's individual biography. Quod erat demonstrandum 3.14159 (talk) 03:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Those articles are about other subjects where he is being interviewed about, not him directly, except for this one which is just an announcement of his election as County Commissioner, but that does not count as substantial coverage.--kelapstick (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I only moved this page from its old location because the name was wrong. I do find it curious, though, that the article would exist, just like this, in its old location with no problem -- but that it would become subject to deletion simply due to the event of its being moved to a more accurate name. (At the old location, he was named as "Jr," though he is not really so named.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.174.105 (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- The nominatino for deletion had nothing to do with the naming of the page, the page just came up as a new page when it got moved, and therefore was in the new page log and became more visable.--kelapstick (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability and Point-of-View
editThis reads like his campaign site. Wikipedia doesn't exist to provide server space to politicians who don't maintain theirs. Further, he doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians); though I can Google around and find him, the articles are not in-depth as specified in the requirements. Fix soon or deletion. J1.grammar natz (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Agree, notability is in question here. I'll look for sources and if needed nominate this article for deletion.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 11:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- I found (on High Beam) about a dozen articles from the now defunct The Cincinnati Post written between the years 2001 and 2006. I think he may be notable.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 12:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Remove photo
editI removed the photo as the subject was not the main feature of the photo and it was unclear even with instruction who was who. We should wait for a better photo rather than using one that is confusing for the reader. Per MOS:IMAGE "Poor quality images (too dark, blurry, etc.) or where the subject in the image is too small, hidden in clutter, ambiguous or otherwise not obvious, should not be used. Contributors should be judicious in deciding which images are the most suitable for the subject matter in an article" [bold added]-- — Keithbob • Talk • 11:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:David Pepper which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)