Talk:David Pugh (Conservative politician)
This page was proposed for deletion by Ironholds (talk · contribs) on 22 February 2010 with the comment: fails WP:POLITICIAN It was contested by Kuyabribri (talk · contribs) on 23 February 2010 with the comment: on behalf of author in light of comment on talk page; please take to AfD |
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion discussion
editThanks for your interest in this article. The reason I created it was because the person involved is currently leader of the Isle of Wight Council. Unlike other areas on the mainland, the local authority covers the entire county, a massive area for a local authority compared to many others with a total population estimated at around 150,000. Since taking up the position the person involved has gained significant press coverage both locally and further afield, initially by laying out very controversial plans to reform the island's education system. More recently he has been involved in situations reguarding an ultimatum supposedly given to Unison branch secretary Mark Chiverton, which later gave him a vote of no confidence on this and the handling of the budget cuts by the council. There's also the issue of the bust up between himself and Andrew Turner's partner Carole. As a result of this continued media attention, together with the size of the local authoriy he is leader of, I would say it meets the second point of notability to the section you linked to in the deletion request.
As it currently stands this is only the start of what I was intending to write on the article, no doubt much more could be said such as the involvement in local political issues, its just it was getting late while I was writing it so decided to stop. If others have anything else to say, please comment. Editor5807speak 13:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am assuming good faith on your part and have contested the proposed deletion on your behalf. For future reference, if you object to deletion of an article with a prod tag, simply remove the prod tag and place the reason why you object to the deletion in your edit summary or on the talk page (as you did). —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Both are irrelevant; see WP:POLITICIAN. I am nominating the article at AfD. Ironholds (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- And this "local council" is hardly much larger than others. All county councils and most borough councils deal with a higher number of people; it is not a claim to notability. Ironholds (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Both are irrelevant; see WP:POLITICIAN. I am nominating the article at AfD. Ironholds (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on David Pugh (Conservative politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140103105330/http://www.islandpulse.co.uk/b2/one-island-identified-by-council-cabinet-reshuffle-2/ to http://www.islandpulse.co.uk/b2/one-island-identified-by-council-cabinet-reshuffle-2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)