Talk:David Stephan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Stephan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:
|
I have made a page for David Stephan. I struggled with the organization of this page since there was so much information surrounding the complicated court cases. I look forward to other editors changes and input.Alhill42 (talk) 03:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
David Stephans son did not die from meningitis! That was discovered in the court case. Contact Lawyer Shawn Buckley for clarification, he is the Alberta Lawyer defending the Stephans. UPDATE THIS!
editStephan court case - death of son. 72.172.96.239 (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi - we use reliable published sources, so if the cause of death of the toddler has been determined to be something other than meningitis - as has been reported in multiple sources, and cited as such in the article - please present those sources here. Thank you - Antandrus (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
How could the parents have believed in COVID conspiracies if he died in 2016?
editGenuine question I'm not familiar with case. Qwexcxewq (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)