Talk:David Thewlis

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ansarya in topic Photo could be better

Other work

edit

There is no mention of his role in Dinotopia, a 2002 TV mini-series produced by Hallmark Entertainment. Rocket Surgeon 09:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

So add it. ISAYsorry 21:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just added a reference in the summary to The Sandman, his most recent work - although listed further along in the article, it's a big-budget miniseries which is likely to be a career highlight. If the addition doesn't fit the flow of the summary, please feel free to amend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.110.76 (talk) 21:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A ballroom?

edit

The article says he owns a Victorian ballroom in Clerkenwell. I figure this must be a British term that I'm unfamiliar with, referring to a particular type of apartment or house, because the only meaning of the word "ballroom" with which I am familiar refers to a room where balls, i.e. dances, formal parties, are held. One does not normally own a ballroom without also owning the hotel, private club, or other establishment it is located in.

Does this term refer to something akin to a studio apartment, but much larger? Or...? LordAmeth (talk) 11:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

(I was stumped by that too!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.35.15.228 (talk) 03:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Or it could be a former "dance palace" like the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackpool_Tower#Tower_Ballroom 46.208.85.178 (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wonder Woman spoiler

edit

I think the references to "Ares" should be removed since it's a plot "twist" not revealed until later in the film. 46.208.85.178 (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Harry Potter in summary

edit
He is probably best known as an actor for his portrayal of Remus Lupin in the Harry Potter films.

This is subjective, informal, debatable, and mentioning one film in his lengthy resume is not appropriate for the opening summary. I'm removing it. Feel free to add it back in if you disagree. 72.189.252.84 (talk) 00:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I changed the wording to "commercially-successful" because I think that is a more accurate description of a widely popular series like Harry Potter. The Red Queen (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Not Involved in the SCA

edit

The citations for David Thewlis' involvement in the Society for Creative Anachronism indicate he helped found the organization in 1965. David Thewlis, the actor, was 2 years old at the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thisisjon (talkcontribs) 07:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

This is because there is another David Thewlis, who did help form the SCA. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Thewlis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Photo could be better

edit

Why is the picture of him one where it is hard to see his face? This is an encyclopedia, not People Magazine. Ansarya (talk) 22:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply