Talk:David Yonggi Cho
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Misty MH in topic Embezzlement controversy misleading
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
needs editor fluent in English and Korean
editThis article is incomprehensible in spots. It needs an editor who can read Korean and write English. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Additional issue: the very first citation in the "Early Life" section is to what looks like it might be a blog in Korean. Is it just a blog? Is it something more? Alephb (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
"no suspicion"
editThe article currently ends with: <<In June 2016, this incident became a non-prosecution because "no suspicion".[7]>>
Could some Wikipedian who reads Korean read the source and tell us a bit more exactly what this means? Alephb (talk) 06:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Why is this so incomplete, focusing on the negative?
editWhy is this so incomplete, and focusing primarily on the negative? No accomplishments, awards, nothing. Misty MH (talk) 07:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Embezzlement controversy misleading
editThe Embezzlement controversy section is misleading. See the church article for details. Misty MH (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)