Talk:Davie Village
(Redirected from Talk:Davie Village, Vancouver, Canada)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Davie Village article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2021 and 16 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sidney Gordon.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- Davie Village, Vancouver, Canada → Davie Village … Rationale: Davie Village already redirects to the article. Why do we need such a long name? … Please share your opinion at Talk:Davie Village, Vancouver, Canada. — Usgnus 02:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Survey
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. Andrewa 02:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Obvious support. Why lengthen the name when there's no other Davie Village article? -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 04:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, with support for a modified proposal to move to Davie Village (Vancouver). Ckatzchatspy 06:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Simple names are best if there is no chance for confusion with another similarly named thing. --Polaron | Talk 06:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support per nom. -- Selmo (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC) ---- Selmo (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom. --Serge 21:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Discussion
editAdd any additional comments ʑ
- Counter-proposal to move to Davie Village (Vancouver). I think including the city name really helps with clarity, it would be consistent with the other city neighbourhoods, and the parentheses are easily removed with a pipe: Davie Village (You don't even have to retype the short form - just include the pipe symbol "|" like so: [[Davie Village (Vancouver)|]]). Perhaps more importantly, even if there is no other "Davie Village" article, naming it as such gives too much presence to a neighbourhood. Just as many cities are tagged with their province/state, neighbourhoods should be tagged with their city, unless it's something really, really well known. Ckatzchatspy 06:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- The only articles (with one exception) in Category:Vancouver neighbourhoods that are disambiguated with (Vancouver) are those that are ambiguous names. --Usgnus 06:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
History
editFrom what I understand this neighbourhood has been a gay neighbourhood since the early 70's. It would be interesting to have that included in the article. --83.248.239.86 (talk) 12:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)