Talk:Davison House/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Maile66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Nominator has been the primary editor since creation, with only two minor edits by others.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    Davison House, Vassar College, August 2014, licensed on Commons
    Davison House postcard, c. 1911, public domain image on Commons
    Commons Freedom of panorama United States: "for buildings completed before December 1, 1990, there is complete FoP, without regard to whether the building is visible from a public place, because the building is public domain, except for the plans."
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    Captions and alt text provided with images
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Everything looks fine to me. — Maile (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply