Talk:Davydov soliton

I have identified who put the tag for "unverified claims" and "original research" - it comes from IP 130.216.30.233. There is NO necessity for any other reference except the given by me - and particularly Scott AS (1992). "Davydov's soliton". Physics Reports 217: 1–67. If one is at least interested in the topic, he should read the Scott 1992 article, and then put tags for unverfied claims etc. I have no time to write free for Wikipedia anymore, due to pseudo-concerned about the quality of the article editors, who vandalize article written by people who have the necessary knowledge. And for the pseudo-concerned editor 130.216.30.233 who added the tag - "Ask yourself, if you vandalize article written by someone who is at well-acquainted with the topic, whether this one will not lose his will to collaborate further on Wikipedia". If you got my point, better go and start popularizing the idea that a pseudo-concerned editor should do careful research before posting TAG that the article is not well sourced, contains original research and etc. Otherwise it means the TAG is put by an ignorant guy who is looking for confrontation and humiliation of the original author. Actually I feel sorry that I wrote the nice summary on Davydov soliton, if I can go back in time, I will have a long thought whether I will write for Wikipedia and for free. p.s. Someone might wish to remove the vandalizing TAG for unverified statements, etc. Best Regards, Danko Georgiev MD (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Status? Suggestion

As a researcher in this area 20+ years ago, I came here looking for some indication of the present status of this theory - are Davydov solitions real, i.e. do they really "happen" in proteins? When I did my PhD, they were a plausible theory with no experimental backup - how is that today? ... Can anyone add a properly sourced update on this question to the article?--Nø (talk) 10:42, 9 August 2014 (UTC)