Talk:Dayak Desa War
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nyanardsan in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Dayak Desa War appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Dayak people from Indonesia returned five skulls of Japanese soldiers killed during Dayak Desa War back to Japan in 1981? Source: https://majalah.tempo.co/read/ilustrasi/51295/tengkorak-tengkorak-yang-kembali ;
- Comment: First five noms, QPQ not required
Created by Nyanardsan (talk). Self-nominated at 05:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC).
I shall review this. There are some obvious issues that will need to be addressed. Please add categories to the article so that the maintenance tag can be removed. Please fix the reference error for what is currently reference # 5. English is obviously not your first language and you need to find somebody who can copyedit the article for grammar and language. For example, if I take the Indonesian version of this article and put it through Google Translate, I get a much better understanding of what was going on. So there is quite a bit of work required for somebody. The article is new, long enough, neutral. QPQ not required. Earwig is clean. I've duplicated the reference that confirms the hook fact and placed it in the right spot. I've put this nomination onto my watchlist so once you've attended to these issues, please comment here. Schwede66 03:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed the ref and cat, not yet for the CE. I'll ask my friend off wiki. Please wait for a while, thanks for reviewing my nomination Nyanardsan (talk) 04:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- All fixed, please take a look. Nyanardsan (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Good to go. Schwede66 18:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nyanardsan, I'm promoting this, but the hook should either say "returned ... to" or "gave back ... to", but not "returned ... back to". I've chosen the first option, but am happy to change it to the second if you'd prefer that one. Please let me know! MeegsC (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- @MeegsC: I prefer "returned...to", because using "gave back" seems would alter the hook sentences significantly. Thanks for promoting it! Nyanardsan (talk) 11:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)