Talk:Dayton Gems (2009–2012)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis redirect is unneccessary. I probably tagged it wrong (Because the redirect csd's don't show up in the list), but it is a redirect based on a team that just began a month ago. It is set up for when the team eventually ends to have an end date put on to it (Which would then require its own redirect) -- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 21:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
EDIT: Nevermind, didn't realize this was a moved page. -- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 21:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved lacking any evidence that this is not the primary topic. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Dayton Gems (2009–) → Dayton Gems –
- Support - Disambiguation is not required. Standard practice is to not disambiguate a currently active franchise (see Winnipeg Jets), and this is the only currently active franchise that is using this name. Hat note can be used to link to Dayton Gems (disambiguation). Dolovis (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support the Ottawa Senators article don't use (1992-) either as per standard practice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.207.225 (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support: Per nom, just makes sense. – Nurmsook! talk... 03:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Comment It isn't as simple as that, we don't always give the primary topic to the current team. In this case the primary topic may very well be the older team if any of them. Being that the IHL team played for 16 years versus the new team that has only played for two. And is further complicated by the fact that there is also a soccer team of the same name. -DJSasso (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.