Talk:De Tomaso Mangusta

If you re-arrange the letters, Mangusta spells Mustang. -> No it doesn't.

Who recognizes this as the most beautiful Detomaso? I am not doubting that some may have this opinion but I would think most people would say the mid 80's Pantera is the masterpiece of Detomaso. This statement is opinion and should be removed.

I agree, it's pure opinion.Scottanon 04:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on De Tomaso Mangusta. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.qv500.com/de-tomaso-registry/de-tomaso-sport-chassis-numbers/de-tomaso-70p-sport-5000/
• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.qv500.com/car-guide/de-tomaso/de-tomaso-mangusta-speciale/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

No Mangusta has ever left the factory with a 32/68 weight distribution. That's bizarre.

Hello, I have came here to announce that I have made an edit to the article regarding the weight distribution. I can assure you that no Mangustas have ever had a 32:68 weight distribution. The manufacturer-written PDF [1] shows a 44:56 weight distribution. Even if De Tomaso did say the Mangusta had a 32/68 ratio, that would beat the rear-engined Porsche 911 in terms of rear weight distribution. No sources before 2010 have ever stated a 32/68 distribution either, according to a Google research [2]. Simply put, the 32/68 number is bogus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.90.113 (talk) 00:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)