Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls/draft
Here is the section on exhibition controversy, for any proposed changes by IsraelXKV8R:
Controversy involving recent and upcoming exhibitions
editIn recent years, exhibitions of the Dead Sea Scrolls have become the subject of controversy. For example, a National Post article entitled "Controversy surrounds exhibit of Dead Sea Scrolls" states: "The Royal Ontario Museum could find itself unearthing old controversies when it opens its $3-million, would-be blockbuster Dead Sea Scrolls exhibition next June." The article explains that a "history professor in the U.S. has accused an earlier, related project in San Diego of deliberate bias, scholarly incompetence and [has] suggest[ed] that its curator, who is also assembling the ROM exhibition, was unqualified for the job." The article indicates that University of Chicago historian Norman Golb "attacked the San Diego show by circulating a 24-page critique of the exhibition catalogue highlighting what he called 'a great many factual errors and unprovable assertions presented as truths.'"[1]
In a letter published in the National Post, Michael Hager, director of the San Diego Natural History Museum, defends the quality of that museum's exhibit, stating that the "ideas presented in the San Diego Dead Sea scrolls exhibition were thoroughly researched by a team of accredited biblical scholars, with several alternative theories for their origin presented."[2] In another letter also published in the same newspaper, Golb states that the "controversy now unfolding about the scrolls arises out of the fact that the debate between the two salient theories of Scroll origins -- the Qumran-Essene theory and the theory of Jerusalem origin -- is featured in a current exhibit at the Jewish Museum in New York. By contrast, most museums in past exhibits have largely concealed this debate from the public. The Royal Ontario Museum, which has a reputation for scientific integrity, now is faced with the problem of presenting a balanced and accurate exhibition."[3] The Wall Street Journal and other newspapers reported that the scholarly debate over the Scrolls' origins was highlighted in the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit held at the Jewish Museum in New York in the Autumn of 2008.[4]
Rachel.Greenberg (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- ^ Adam McDowell, "Controversy surrounds exhibit of Dead Sea Scrolls" (November 13, 2008), http://www.nationalpost.com/arts/story.html?id=954321; Golb's critique is available on the University of Chicago website at http://www.oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/dss_review_sandiego_catalogue_2007.pdf
- ^ "Controversy Dogs Dead Sea Scrolls," November 13, http://www.nationalpost.com/related/topics/story.html?id=983256
- ^ "More Dead Sea Scrolls Controversy," http://www.nationalpost.com/related/topics/story.html?id=983256
- ^ http://www.thejewishmuseum.org/exhibitions/DeadSeaScrolls; http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122238636935776931.html?mod=googlenews_wsj; http://www.thejewishweek.com/viewArticle/c347_a13745/The_Arts/Museums.html