Talk:Dead or Alive (video game)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dead or Alive (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Dead or Alive" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Boob Controversy
editWhy is there no specific stuff in the article about the breast controversy? I recall at the time that when the game was released for Playstation, plenty of reviewers thought the game was fantastic -- but that it was extremely lame for them to make it so that all women in the game had breasts seemingly made out of jello. They bounced up and down like there was no tomorrow. Many thought it was a really sexist and especially wrong for children to see when they play the game. If anyone else reads this know what I am talking about, feel free to comment on this issue. Mastgrr 01:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Because it's already mentioned in the article about the series. --elias.hc 07:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I can't see any mention of controversy. Also, can anyone substantiate the claim that there was controversy. It seems the OP is expressing his/her own opinion about breasts in the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frognsausage (talk • contribs) 12:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, the OP is summarizing contemporary reviews for the game with remarkable (even eerie) accuracy. The only error is the bit about children; the game was rated "T" for Teen in the U.S. and I believe got similar ratings in other countries, so no one was worried about children seeing it. I've since researched the contemporary reception for the game and included a paragraph in the article about this issue. Martin IIIa (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Triva Section
editThe problem that I have with this section is that it states that if the first game failed, that "Tecmo may not exist today". I sincerely doubt it, and thus I find this to be POV. -—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.236.128 (talk • contribs)
- Looking at the reference (gained by unlocking through the resepctive game), that's what the possibility entelled. As per the nature of the company, and they're potential income, it is somewhat unlikely. I've made a minor re-write. -ZeroTalk 13:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Character Roster
editI don't think my mention of this game having more male characters then female was POV. Let's face it, the series IS more focused on the female characters today (which has been made clear by the creation of DOA: XBV), and I just wanted to mention it for those who thought that it had been the case since the first game which again, has more male character characters (with Ayane, the game only has four females; the rest are male). -—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.236.128 (talk • contribs)
- No it wasn't biased. It was unnnecessary, and was considered indescriminate information. No article regarding this series makes note of the gender ratio, and its certainly not required here. -ZeroTalk 13:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- It ran the thin line of interesting trivia to the flat-out trivial, and was excised as a result. And to say differently on the girl front is odd, considering the bounce ratio here could be nuttier than anywhere else. Papacha 01:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Story
edit"Prologe [sic] Lifted from the game manual" How is this not a copyvio? ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 12:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Its within policy. Reading over the discussion on the Wikipedia:Copyright issues, it doesn't infringe upon the company's ability to sell, market and distribute the game. The context was also sourced to its original origin, so there's no false claim of distribution. -ZeroTalk 12:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- It is, nonetheless, lazy. There's no commentary whatsoever, it doesn't really illustrate any specific point, it's just awkward prose lifted wholesale. Also, where is the pertinent discussion at Wikipedia:Copyright issues? I found nothing that deals with this case. Going by WP:FAIR#Text, the reproduction of this text doesn't really fall under the aegis of fair use. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 13:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Its within policy. Reading over the discussion on the Wikipedia:Copyright issues, it doesn't infringe upon the company's ability to sell, market and distribute the game. The context was also sourced to its original origin, so there's no false claim of distribution. -ZeroTalk 12:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well I think you've a point there. The first game was very ambigous concerning the story; it wasn't paticularly concerning any sequels. It might be wise to remove it and let the reader go off the character artcles instead. I'll remove it for now and see if the Saturn release has something more elaborate to explain what precisely happened. -ZeroTalk 13:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reconsideration. I think that the story section could briefly summarize establishment of the DOA tournament by DOATEC, the motivations and backgrounds of specific characters are already covered in their respective articles. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 13:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Dead or Alive Original
editOnce upon a time, a loong time ago, my friend rented a game for his playstation, Dead or Alive. It was a hard game to master, but one mystery was that one of the characters explodes into what seems like super shiny flower petals as a victory pose. I looked up our Wikipedia articles on this game, but I forgot what she looks like. Does anyone know what I'm talking about? --JDitto 04:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Rating
editDeleted this section because it was a personal opinion with no reference what so ever.--24.139.144.232 (talk) 07:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Backgrounds in Playstation 1 version?
editThe article alleges (reference?) that the Saturn couldn't cope with 3D backgrounds but doesn't mention if the Playstation version had the same problem. Makes it sound either 1) Like the article is only about the Saturn version 2) that the person writing just wanted to slag off the Saturn. Frognsausage (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
This site suggests they were also 2D backgrounds on the Playstation version: http://www.absolute-playstation.com/api_review/rdoa.htm Frognsausage (talk) 12:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Dead or Alive (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.allgame.com/game.php?id=9888&tab=review
- Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.allgame.com/game.php?id=1837&tab=review
- Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.gameinformer.com/cgi-bin/review.cgi?sys=psx&path=may98&doc=doa
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.japan-gamecharts.com/sat.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dead or Alive (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160319000936/http://archive.videogamesdaily.com/features/itagaki_interview_feb05_p1.asp to http://archive.videogamesdaily.com/features/itagaki_interview_feb05_p1.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dead or Alive (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015020634/http://uk.xbox.ign.com/articles/535/535283p1.html to http://uk.xbox.ign.com/articles/535/535283p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)