Talk:Dead or Alive 4

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Sonic100jam in topic TopTen?

Aspect Ratio

edit

In the side box, it says 720p as the aspect ratio. 720p is a resolution, not an aspect ratio. 24.228.17.179 (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Negativity

edit

Ever heard of the phrase, "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all"? Deleting the gameplay section until someone who doesn't want to whine about the difficulty can make an actual gameplay write-up simply talking about the actual new gameplay features, or the increased speed of the game in comparison to the past DOA's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.197.153.253 (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dead or Alive 4

edit

The Bugs and Critism pages need to be edited, they are very outdated and I have even posted at the bottom of the critism page counteracting the "problems" that some biased user posted.

The Bugs should be deleted entirely, as an auto-update patch fixes that as well.

Various sections

edit

I went ahead and removed various bits of nonsense, such as the critismim section and whatnot. I believe we all know why. -ZeroTalk 17:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Demo release

edit

According to Next Generation, Tecmo will launch a demo release on Xbox Live in Japan. Yes, 6 months after releasing the game. See http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3484&Itemid=2 -- ReyBrujo 01:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Difficulty

edit

I have added a paragraph about the difficulty of the game. I feel it is important as it has put off many new players to fighting games and was not mentioned in the article. Fans of DOA2/3 will not expect the difficulty change and mass market players don't have a chance of keeping up with it. Probably accounting for all the pre-owned copies of the game available in stores. Mr.bonus 14:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is it really all that difficult? It's no tougher than the first DOA, in my opinion. The difficulty of overcoming early-stage opponents is exaggerated.219.74.36.236 08:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


This was in the main article

edit

The big jump in difficulty could be due to Team Ninja wanting the single player mode to feel more like playing top rank players over Xbox Live.[citation needed]

I agree this may be the reason but can anyone find a source as it may be true but needs citing. Bobmills 16:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think that the whole "difficulty" section of the article makes it sound far too whiney. It's good to have maybe a brief mention, but a paragraph is annoying to read.Shane Strife 23:15, 15 October 2007

Review section

edit

This article should have a section at the bottom to link to external reviews like many other related articles, especially since there is so little written about it in comparison with other games in the series. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.184.195.190 (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

References for theses

edit

I've deleted the paragraph below as i couldn't find adequate references for them. If you can find references stick them back on the page. I'm guessing a reference for "greatest installment in the series", and one for "hired professional DOA players".

"Since its release, Dead or Alive 4 has been given rave reviews by numerous gaming magazines and websites, with some touting it as the greatest installment in the series, thanks to a revamped fighting system, gorgeous graphics, and smooth and entertaining online play. Series creator Tomonobu Itagaki even hired professional DOA players to help smooth out the kinks in the fighting system." Alexdeangelis86 00:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Story

edit

The story section needs to be added to. Alexdeangelis86 00:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reception

edit

I'm not sure I catch the misspelling in the quote "really cool, interesting, and very unique [sic]". Last time I checked, we spell unique u-n-i-q-u-e. If it's some other word misspelled, then the [sic] should be moved to immediately after the error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradwilcox (talkcontribs) 17:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nicole-458

edit

WikiProject Halo seems to have hijacked a DOA article and its redirects. Nicole (Dead or Alive) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was redirected to Characters of Halo, where the info subsequently removed (probably because it's not a HALO character).

The other redirects include Nicole (DOA) and Nicole (Dead or Alive character)

65.94.252.195 (talk) 10:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Per discussion on my talk page, I have restored the article and placed merge template for the proper target. 65.94.252.195 (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Dead or Alive 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dead or Alive 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dead or Alive 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

TopTen?

edit

Hi Sonic100jam, I don't follow your revert ("The "TopTens.fun" is a publication site. It's not The Top Tens community site.") See WP:VG/RS, TopTens.fun isn't listed at all. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

TopTens.fun isn't a gaming publication, but it's a mixed variety publication that discusses various works of pop culture, entertainment, businesses and products, similar to "Complex" and "Virgin Media". On "The Top Tens.com" community site, anyone can create there own top ten list and publish it on the website.--Sonic100jam (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply