Talk:Dean Smith Center

Sad news for readers of this article: Dean Dome designer dies -Jcbarr 16:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Architecturally notable as a "hybrid" dome. See http://cedb.asce.org/CEDBsearch/record.jsp?dockey=0044356 D.B.Updike (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment from Remember talk page.

Dean Smith Center article

You said: "The other citation just leads to one quote where someone refers to music being piped in. It would be nice to get an article that more fully talked about the incident."

The cited article said:"But we're in the goose-bumps business. To make it sound like it is happening at the moment is hardly a federal offense. It's called Showbiz."

- Art Chansky, on adding artifcial [sic] crowd noise to the UNC broadcasts

I don't know about any 'piping in music', I just found a source where Art Chansky defends the practice of piping in crowd noise. If it doesn't please you then feel free to find more. Duke53 22:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought you were citing to the following quote on that was on the referenced webpage - "It's ridiculous to pipe in noise. A live game should be just that -- if the crowd's quiet, it's quiet. If it's loud, let it be loud. It doesn't need to be enhanced." former UNC great Bobby Jones. I think the topic you brought up about artificial crowd noise is a very interesting and I was hoping you could find a reference that fully discusses what was being done because I have not been able to find one that fully discusses this. Remember 06:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Where is music mentioned in the passage ("It's ridiculous to pipe in noise. A live game should be just that -- if the crowd's quiet, it's quiet. If it's loud, let it be loud. It doesn't need to be enhanced." - former UNC great Bobby Jones) you quote? Jones specifically mentions 'noise'; I see nothing about music in that quote.Duke53 16:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

You're right. I didn't mean to say music in my edit summary. I meant to say "crowd noise." My mistake. I will try to be more accurate in my "edit summary" comments in the future. Remember 17:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dean Smith Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426001341/http://www.paulhowardconstruction.com/Projects.aspx to http://www.paulhowardconstruction.com/Projects.aspx
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaab/recap?gid=200503060413
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081019233238/http://tarheelblue.cstv.com:80/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/unc/sports/m-baskbl/auto_pdf/0809quickfacts to http://tarheelblue.cstv.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/unc/sports/m-baskbl/auto_pdf/0809quickfacts

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dean Smith Center/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: G. Moore (talk · contribs) 15:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

NC Project Review

From a WikiProject NC perspective, this is a good article. It contains inline sourcing, appropriate amount of imgages and tables. Other projects may also want to review this page. Did not detect any copyrighted material. User:G._Moore Talk 15:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)