Talk:Deanna Laney murders
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Title, Expand Stub
editI think the title is inappropriate for a BLP. Deanna Laney was found not guilty of murder due to insanity. To also add her to categories that imply she is guilty of being a murderer is not a neutral point of view and hints strongly at libel. "Deanna Laney" would be more appropriate, since people who are interested in her will more likely search simply her name rather than by what what she did.
Seeing that Laney was a high profile case of national importance, I think she deserves a bio that is more detailed, including a more involved treatment of her medical, legal and religious histories. I seem to recall she was involved with a very charismatic preacher that may have influenced her, and I also remember many articles where the media had made an issue of this aspect. Pschologists have said that psychosis and charismatic religious influences are a dangerous combination.
Also, the article's graphic descriptions seem unencyclopedic to me. "Bashed in their skulls" (paraphrased) sounds a little sophomoric and unprofessional for an encyclopedia. "Murders" as a word would probably work better as "filicides" or killings to avoid any implication Laney is guilty of any crime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.64.41.117 (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)