Talk:Debates within libertarianism

Todo

• Add real introduction
• Rewrite the lengthier summaries
• Rewrite the summaries that present only one position, or strike them if there is only one position to present.
• Move/copy over citations from libertarianism, from whence this article was ripped. Should remove unused citations in libertarianism after copying over the citations used here.

MrZaius^talk 18:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

There are certainly stronger criticisms of libertarianism than those presented here. It might be useful to cite specific examples. For instance, consequentialist Libertarians could have argued all day long and would never have taken the steps necessary to end slavery in the US. And clearly they're the only type that would even have considered trying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.69.223.249 (talk) 21:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Another to do: Get some WP:RS. Lots of such libertarian sources exist. See Libertarianism article. CarolMooreDC (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Questions

1. Is there a compelling reason why the issues listed here are not in alphabetical order? FreedomWorks! (talk) 13:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

1. Is there a compelling reason why they ought to be? Is there a clear best name for each one, and thus a most correct alphabetical order? —Tamfang (talk) 17:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Libertarian perspectives

There now exist dozens of articles of the type "Libertarian perspectives on ..." I believe they are way too narrow topics for an encyclopedia. (We don't have articles like "Liberal perspectives on ..." or "Conservative perspectives on ...")

Among them, Tisane (talk · contribs) has recently created a number of stub pages; the articles usually amount to "Libertarian oppose X" or "Libertarians oppose the regulation of Y". Among exceptions are Libertarian perspectives on religion - but then it seems that libertarians make much the same arguments for and against religion as anybody else.

I suggest merging anything useful in these articles into main topics and/or Libertarianism, or - if there's nothing useful to merge - nominating them for deletion.

For a list of pages, see Category:Controversies within libertarianism. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Any particular reason for this proposed purge? Why not aspire to greater depth of coverage in comparable philosophies and debates? This material is far from controversial, and very, very, well trodden in secondary sources within both academia and political media. Skomorokh 16:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, for example Libertarian perspectives on conspiracy theories is a way too narrow topic. As I had said, other articles could be summarized as, for example, "Libertarians oppose gun control"; I don't see any potential for expansion. For yet other topics, there's nothing special about libertarian positions; some libertarians support say, the death penalty, some oppose it; so do non-libertarians. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

The impression you are giving is that this is content that you don't find interesting or remarkable; that's fine, but it by no means follows that your experience of the material will hold true for other readers or that the encyclopaedia would benefit from its deletion. The only relevant concerns are whether we can cover these topicsin a way that verifiable, neutral, and in keeping with our mission. I'm far from convinced that we cannot. Skomorokh 17:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

There's certainly a case to be made for merging many of these together, as has happened with the similar Issues in anarchism for instance, but that is a separate question from whether the topics themselves are worth covering in the first instance. Skomorokh 17:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Libertarians on capital punishment versus abortion

This article makes it sound like most libertarians support capital punishment and support abortion rights. Is this really the case? I guess there are probably no polls about this but it seems like most oppose capital punishment but support abortion rights. Just wondering if somebody else has a sense about this. –Cwenger (talk) 18:14, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

No debate stated on LGBT Rights

There's a section on LGBT Rights in the list of debated topics, but that section does not actually note any debate on the topic of LGBT rights. To my knowledge there is none. Unless some is exhibited, I suggest that section is deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.208.111 (talk) 05:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Debates within libertarianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071212055615/http://www.theadvocates.org/ruwart/questions_maint.php?Category=1&id=288 to http://www.theadvocates.org/ruwart/questions_maint.php?Category=1&id=288

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Libertarianism as known throughout world not included?

I can't help but notice that this article only includes the debates in the American right-libertarian camp. Shouldn't there be sections for the original libertarians who are the most throughout the world? (anarchism/libertarian socialism)

For instance, it says that "most libertarians are against violent revolution," when that is simply false. It's really only true for America. 2607:FB90:5020:73D8:14EE:9812:673B:1DB8 (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Debates within libertarianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130112210848/http://www.virginialawreview.org/content/pdfs/92/1605.pdf to http://www.virginialawreview.org/content/pdfs/92/1605.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)